Turbocharging Innovation: How Proof-of-Principle Testing Drives Competitive Edge

October 7, 2024 | Jules Lam, M.Eng

In manufacturing, precision is paramount. Consider a new product design that requires meticulous assembly to ensure optimal performance. If components are not correctly aligned, the system may experience inefficiencies and potential failures. The challenge lies in finding ways to optimize part and product performance, which can lead to enhanced efficiency and improved overall performance. An innovative approach to product design and assembly could have the potential to give your company a competitive edge.

But how can you test part or product performance ideas?

Proof-of-principle (POP) studies, sometimes referred to as proof-of-concept studies, allow manufacturers to determine if a new concept or innovation theory can be successfully implemented. These studies can also allow companies to accelerate product development by incorporating design for manufacturability (DFM) practices early in the product development process to optimize for future automated production at scale.

Let’s Look at a Real Use Case for Proof-of-Principle Studies

A large turbocharger manufacturer was designing a turbo core that was equipped with a new bearing assembly. The wheel bearing needs to be preloaded correctly, which means tightening/loosening the nut holding the bearing to apply the correct tension. If the nut is too loose, there will be excess play and vibration, but if it’s too tight, then there will be higher friction, which will negatively influence the bearing’s lifespan. The product design team determined that to apply the proper preload, required that the impeller wheel of the core be stretched the width of two human hairs when it was torqued to the sub-assembly. If this improvement could be accomplished, it would yield a more efficient core and, in turn, provide a more fuel-efficient engine. This new design would be a differentiator in the market.

To understand the magnitude of the problem, we first need to recognize how small is the width of two human hairs?

Size Comparison. 
Largest circle: 70 Micron Dia. 
Diameter of Human Hair (.0020")
Medium circle: 40 Micron Dia. 
Naked-Eye Visibility Threshold
(.0015")
Medium circle: 25 Micron Dia. 
White Blood Cell
(.0010")
Second smallest circle: 8 Micron Dia. 
Red Blood Cell
(.0003")
Smallest circle: 2 Micron Dia. 
Coccus Bacteria
(.00008")
Micron size comparison.

One millimeter is one-thousandth of a meter. One micrometer (micron) is one-millionth of a meter or one-thousandth of a millimeter. The size of 0.140 mm (140 microns) is comparable to the width of two human hairs.

This implies that the measurement system needs to be able to travel 140 microns accurately. The problem is even more complicated because even if one could measure accurately in the 140-micron range, the other requirement was to be within +/- 5 microns of the target.

How can we build a system that could achieve this? From the image above, this would mean the system would travel two human hairs with a tolerance width of a red blood cell.

The automotive part manufacturer had reached out to many automation providers to solve this problem. Unfortunately, they had no success. Some vendors said they could do this work but provided concepts that had margins of error greater than 1 mm (or not even committing to a tolerance). ATS Industrial Automation recognized that this was a difficult challenge and recommended a POP study be conducted.

Why Perform a Proof-Of-Principle Study?

A POP study is an examination of the problem using the essential instrumentation items that can justify a design or concept. In other words, it answers the question, “why do we believe this can be done?” Engineers can identify potential challenges, validate assumptions, and assess the feasibility of a solution. If the solution is not achievable in a POP study, then alternate solutions must be identified or invented.

Benefits of Proof-Of-Principle Testing

There are many benefits of performing a POP study. By making a small investment, manufacturers can mitigate big risks.

The findings of a POP study will help drive:

  • The design for the final equipment.
  • Identification of factors affecting results.
  • Estimation of part-to-part cycle time (determining if one or more machines meet throughput)
  • Production scale-up concepts.

The stakeholders of a successful POP study will obtain scientific justification to spend money on capital equipment with a machine design that has a high probability of working, even though it may be first-of-a-kind.

What Happened with the Turbocharger in the POP Study?

Once the turbocharger company approved the POP study, the ATS team designed a machine concept.

The Proof-of-Principle Study Problem Statement:

“How to accurately torque the nut on the turbo core to stretch it by 140 microns?”

“Can an automated station be built to go onto an assembly line to do this stretch process?”

“How do we prevent side loading when torquing the nut?”

“How do we control environmental factors to get the required repeatability?

“How can the POP testing be set up so proximity to the system vibration does not impact measurements?”

Engineering Toolbox

A POP study cannot be properly executed if the tools used for the experiment are not well-defined. For example, measuring a length using a ruler versus a precision caliper can yield different results. This POP study required mechanical design elements, electrical interfaces and software control to collect meaningful data.

From a mechanical standpoint, the system needed a structure that would not be affected by vibrations. The fixture also needed to account for alignment issues, and coupling to the part should not add additional load to the part. Furthermore, the part under test needed to be suspended to isolate it from further vibrations.

The mechanical design and toolmakers created a custom fixture to provide a stable platform to hold the part. On the electrical side, the data acquisition hardware, relays, sensors, and servo motor need to be designed in and wired into the machine.

Upper Cylinder for Shaft Measurement. Block that Detects for Position Change. Sensor Range Adjust (Manual Screw). Servo Motor. Top Cylinder Control (Manual Air Toggle Box). Gearing to Transfer Torque to Nut. Upper Tooling Position Control (Manual Ratchet). DUT on Pallet. Lower Tooling Position Control (Manual Screw). Lower Socket with Inner Ball to Suspend DUT.
POP setup. Prototype tooling including servo mounted vertically, high accuracy laser pointing to flag, instrumentation panel, and laptop controls.

In addition, even for a POP study, a safety circuit was designed to allow for the safe operation of the machine. Measurement of signals needed to follow best practices such as proper cable shielding and grounding.

ATS Test Executive software programmed for PoP study.
ATS Test Executive software programmed for POP study.
Note: servo position, torque, and laser position are all monitored in the same time domain. It was determined the speed of the servo was tuned correctly for the increment of laser position. This helped prevent damage to the part from over/under-torquing the nut.

Software is also a required prerequisite for a successful POP study. ATS has developed software known as the ATS Test Executive Suite, which is a robust, flexible tool designed for rapid application development. It has a library of tools to accommodate a variety of hardware interfaces and built-in routines for process control. ATS Test Executive Suite was configured for this application to collect multiple sensor data at a high sample rate, synchronized in the time domain while managing servo control.

After the data collection, it required some normalization and analysis to find meaningful transitions. The POP study required the software to be adaptable to changing test procedures based on findings. Using the ATS Test Executive Suite allowed changes to be made promptly.

Initial Proof-of-Principle Study Design

The turbo core would be suspended in the air above the conveyor, and both upper/lower tooling would engage. This is to ensure there is no side load applied to the turbo core and that vibrations from other equipment (like the conveyor) are not influencing the measurement. In addition, the nut tightening servo is centered when the part is lifted from the pallet. The lower tooling is comprised of a fixed socket to hold one end of the wheel. The upper tooling is comprised of a high-accuracy servo motor and torque transducer.

DUT Should be Suspended at the Shaft & Wheel
Part presentation with turbo core suspended in the machine. Removes elements of side load, reduces friction, provides vertical alignment, and isolates from conveyor vibration.

The torque measurement system would tighten the nut to a known torque. By knowing the pitch of the shaft, and number of turns required to tighten, the desired stretch would occur when the torque of the nut was achieved.

This concept had repeatability issues. The team found that it was difficult to correlate the number of turns to the amount of travel in the vertical direction. The torque amount would change based on the thread quality of the shaft and the sensitivity of the torque transducer.

A Secondary Design was Implemented

High accuracy laser pointing to measurement block.
Upper tooling. High-accuracy laser pointing to measurement block. Laser capable of measuring 0.0005 mm, with a working range of 15 mm +- 1.3 mm.

Rather than using a torque measurement in the horizontal direction, a high accuracy laser was mounted to the upper tooling to determine the length of the shaft. By controlling the servo to move based on the laser position in closed-loop control (PID), it can automatically stop at the desired displacement change. This design showed promising results and was able to achieve the desired measurement and tolerance.

Analyzing the data collected from the ATS Test Executive Suite, it could be determined the optimal clamp speed of the servo, the amount of torque applied to the part, the vertical displacement for the stretch, and the cycle time of the operation.

Turbocharger Proof-of-Principle Study Results

The findings of the proof-of-principle study were presented to the customer. The POP system delivered promising results that justified the need for custom fixturing and instrumentation selection.

The ATS Test Executive Software packaged all the design considerations together so that there was data to justify a machine of this nature to be built. Overall, the customer was happy with the outcome of the POP study. Prototyping a micron-level measurement system designed for the customer product was an impressive feat.

Production machines as a result of the successful POP Study.

This first-of-a-kind solution demonstrates ATS Industrial Automation’s ability to combine fixturing mechanical know-how, as well as software controls and electrical measurement instrumentation designs. Following these findings, the automotive manufacturer gave ATS an order to build four machines that are currently situated around the world producing the next generation turbo core.

Every project is unique. Allow us to listen to your challenges and share how proof of principle testing can launch your project on time.

Additional Resources

Jules Lam, M.Eng

Group Lead, Software Engineering

ATS Industrial Automation

Jules is a Test and Measurement expert with 22+ years of experience in Software Engineering. He develops testing solutions across various industries typically around challenges arising from data acquisition, signal processing, bus communications, time synchronization, and system control.